savoy091

Consider the following criteria in terms of peer-assessing the presentation. Criteria 1: Motivation 0 = Unclear what drove this research or why it may be important. 1 = Motivation: You can clearly identify 'why' they studied this particular problem and 'why' it may be important. 2 = Clear motivation, plus they clearly identified the problems(s) by initial analysis and/or presented extant knowledge, current hypotheses, and identified gaps in knowledge. Critera 2: Data 0 = Unclear what research data was gathered or why what was done is relevant. 1 = Data through discovery: They have shown that they have independently researched the problem area(s) 2 = Discovery is evident AND the research data gathered convincingly addresses the problem area, that is, the kind of data gathered is likely to yield insights that may address the problem area. Criteria 3: Analysis 0 = Unclear how findings or recommendations were arrived at. 1 = Findings are analysed cogently and convincingly; ...